RES JUDICATA DESCONSTITUTIVE ACTION BASED ON PRECEDENT VIOLATION: AN INTEPRETATIVE PROPOSAL FOR THE APPLICABILITY OF ANNULATORY ACTION IN THE ARBITRAL SENTENCE

RES JUDICATA DESCONSTITUTIVE ACTION BASED ON PRECEDENT VIOLATION: AN INTEPRETATIVE PROPOSAL FOR THE APPLICABILITY OF ANNULATORY ACTION IN THE ARBITRAL SENTENCE

Blog Article

The purpose of this article is to analyze the scope of the rescission action for violation of the judicial precedent, specifically in contained list of art.927, CPC15.Having verified this, a proposal arises to apply the same rule to arbitration awards.Based on the specialized literature on the subject, it is possible galaxy s23 ultra otterbox defender case to affirm both the admissibility of rescission action in jurisdictional judgments, and of annulment action in arbitral judgments that violate judicial precedents.

Therefore, the activity of the arbitral court is equivalent to the judicial pronouncements, it is not being correct to admit that, on the one hand the court is subject to the cooley needle holder precedent and, on the other hand, the arbitral court is free from its observance.